<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Children&#039;s Education Council of Missouri - CECM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cec-mo.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cec-mo.org</link>
	<description>Missouri Education Reform Nonprofit: Schools Choice Legislation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Teacher tenure reform bill emphasizes performance, establishes &#8220;Teacher Multiyear Contract Act&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/teacher-tenure-reform-bill-emphasizes</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/teacher-tenure-reform-bill-emphasizes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher Tenure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traditional District Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Scott Dieckhaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher Tenure Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Bill 1526, introduced to the late last week by Rep. Scott Dieckhaus (R-Washington), proposes sweeping changes to the current state statutes related to teacher tenure. The bill places strong emphasis on teacher performance, tying performance-based evaluations to teacher contracts.  One provision of the bill, known as the “Teacher Multiyear Contract Act” mandates that teachers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"><a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/billsummary.aspx?bill=HB1526&amp;year=2012&amp;code=R">House Bill 1526</a>, introduced to the late last week by <a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/member.aspx?district=109&amp;year=2012">Rep. Scott Dieckhaus (R-Washington)</a>, proposes sweeping changes to the current state statutes related to teacher tenure. The bill places strong emphasis on teacher performance, tying performance-based evaluations to teacher contracts.  One provision of the bill, known as the “Teacher Multiyear Contract Act” mandates that teachers beginning employment on or after July 1, 2013 will initially be placed on a one-year contract. After the first year, teachers will enter into a multiyear contract for periods of two to four years. Contract length and terms will be affected by student assessment results, student growth and achievement, and comprehensive teacher evaluations.  Another key component of the legislation is that employee performance, as defined by each school board, will be the sole criterion for making personnel decisions related to reduction in force and length of teacher contracts, as opposed to the current system which honors seniority. A hearing on this bill is scheduled in the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee on February 1, 2012 at 8am.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div>CECM enthusiastically supports this legislation.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/teacher-tenure-reform-bill-emphasizes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cunningham files comprehensive plan for failing school districts</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/cunningham-files-comprehensive</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/cunningham-files-comprehensive#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholarship Tax Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City Public Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passport Scholarship Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Jane Cunningham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Public Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turner v. Clayton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If passed by the legislature, Senate Bill 706, filed Thursday, January 26 by Senator Jane Cunningham (R-St. Louis County), would dramatically change urban education statewide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cec-mo.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Cunningham2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3263" title="Cunningham" src="http://www.cec-mo.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Cunningham2-147x150.jpg" alt="" width="147" height="150" /></a>If passed by the legislature, <a href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/12info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&amp;BillID=643206">Senate Bill 706</a>, filed Thursday, January 26 by <a href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/12info/members/mem07.htm">Sen. Jane Cunningham (R-St. Louis County)</a>, would dramatically change urban education statewide. This bill has been offered in exchange for enforcement of the <a href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c100-199/1670000131.htm">Revised Missouri Statute 167.131</a> which states that children who live in unaccredited school districts have the right to transfer to a school district in the same or adjoining county at no expense to the family.  This is the same statute that prompted the now infamous <em>Turner vs. The Clayton School District</em>.</p>
<p>One of the most significant changes offered by the proposed legislation is the establishment of a “Passport Scholarship Program” which would provide grant scholarships to students in unaccredited districts, allowing them to attend a qualified public or private school. Contributors to the fund would receive a .60 cent tax credit for each donated dollar. A clearinghouse would also be established to assist Passport Scholarship Program recipients in transferring out of failed districts into an accredited district, charter, virtual, or private school.</p>
<p>Additional components of the bill include unique provisions for each of the state’s largest cities, Kansas City and St. Louis, both of which contain unaccredited school districts. In Kansas City, the Kansas City School District would be dissolved and adjoining school districts would be required to annex and operate the city’s schools. In St. Louis, districts in surrounding St. Louis County would be able to operate charter schools within the St. Louis Public School District, as city students would also simultaneously be allowed to transfer to county schools if space permits.  A hearing on this bill is scheduled for Tuesday, January 31 at 3pm.</p>
<p>CECM enthusiastically supports this legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/cunningham-files-comprehensive/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House holds hearing on school accreditation bill</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/house-holds-hearing-school-accreditation</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/house-holds-hearing-school-accreditation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Chris Nicastro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Mike Lair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school accreditation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the Missouri House of Representatives held a public hearing on a bill that would streamline the process for the State’s oversight of education in unaccredited districts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, January 25, the Missouri House of Representatives held a public hearing on a bill that would streamline the process for the State’s oversight of education in unaccredited districts. <a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/billsummary.aspx?bill=HB1174&amp;year=2012&amp;code=R">House Bill 1174</a>, sponsored by <a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/member.aspx?district=007&amp;year=2012">Rep. Mike Lair (R- Chillicothe)</a>, provides for three main changes: first, it removes the current two-year waiting period between classifying a district as unaccredited and the time when the district will lapse; second, it grants the state Board of Education the flexibility to determine and develop the local governance structure of the unaccredited district; and third, it allows for a method for residents of the unaccredited district to provide comment in determining the local governance structure. Several witnesses provided testimony in support of the bill, including State Education Commissioner Dr. Chris Nicastro, who asserted that the state needs the flexibility to deal with each unaccredited district and their unique situations. There was no testimony in opposition to the bill. CECM has no position on the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/house-holds-hearing-school-accreditation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charter school expansion subject of House, Senate hearings</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/charter-school-expansion-subject</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/charter-school-expansion-subject#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charter Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Stouffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missouri charter school expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisionally accredited schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tishaura Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unaccredited schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Wednesday, the House and Senate Elementary and Secondary Education Committees each held hearings on almost identical bills that would allow for charter schools to be established in any public school district that is unaccredited or provisionally accredited. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, January 25, the House and Senate Elementary and Secondary Education Committees each held hearings on almost identical bills that would allow for charter schools to be established in any public school district that is unaccredited or provisionally accredited. If this bill becomes law, it would modify current statutes that only allows for charters in St. Louis and Kansas City, Missouri School Districts. Increasing charter school accountability is also a provision of the bill.  <a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/billsummary.aspx?bill=HB1228&amp;year=2012&amp;code=R">House Bill 1228</a> is sponsored by<a href="http://www.house.mo.gov/member.aspx?district=063&amp;year=2012"> Rep. Tishaura Jones (D-St. Louis)</a> and <a href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/12info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&amp;BillID=9253">Senate Bill 576</a> is sponsored by <a href="http://www.senate.mo.gov/12info/members/mem21.htm">Sen. Bill Stouffer (R-Marshall)</a>. The bills would also permit charter schools in accredited districts, but only when established by the local school board. CECM has no position on the bills but will continue to track this proposed legislation. For a complete list of unaccredited and provisionally accredited school districts in Missouri, click <a href="http://www.childrenseducationalliance-mo.org/map-failing-districts-test">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/charter-school-expansion-subject/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>St. Louis Firefighters Announce Lawsuit to Enforce Outstanding Schools Act</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/st-louis-firefighters-announce</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/st-louis-firefighters-announce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outstanding Schools Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of the St. Louis Fire Department held a press conference this morning to announce their participation in a lawsuit related to the Outstanding Schools Act. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Members of the St. Louis Fire Department held a press conference this morning to announce their participation in a lawsuit related to the Outstanding Schools Act. Under this law, passed in 1993 by the Missouri General Assembly and the late Governor Mel Carnahan, students in unaccredited school districts may transfer to accredited districts, at the cost of the failing district. The lawsuit would sue districts for failing to comply with the Outstanding Schools Act.</p>
<p>The St. Louis Public Schools have been unaccredited since 2007. Tim Belz, attorney for the plaintiffs, explained that the St. Louis firefighters&#8217; residency requirements limit their families&#8217; educational options. “Firefighters must live in the City of St. Louis for the duration of their careers,” Belz said. “These men and women provide the highest level of service and selflessness. They deserve our gratitude, but what they get are sleepless nights and financial strain trying to provide a quality education for their children. The Outstanding Schools Act is a crystal-clear law, yet suburban school districts refuse to comply.”</p>
<p>Plaintiff Shawn Ryan worries about educational stability for his eleven-year-old daughter. “We want the certainty that a clear educational path provides,” Ryan said. “We don&#8217;t want the future to be unpredictable when it comes to our daughter&#8217;s education.”</p>
<p>Captain Mike Fitzgerald, a member of Local 73, agrees. “My wife and I have two young daughters and are expecting our third child any day now. We&#8217;re trying to figure out what to do about school, and we&#8217;re worried the cost will be more than we can afford. We&#8217;ve already made sacrifices, and I&#8217;ve seen the men and women in my crew make sacrifices, too. This is tough on everyone.”</p>
<p>The lawsuit has been filed in St. Louis City and a trial date will be announced shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/st-louis-firefighters-announce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teacher Tenure focus of ballot initiative, upcoming legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/teacher-tenure-focus-ballot-initiative</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/teacher-tenure-focus-ballot-initiative#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher Tenure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teacher tenure reform is the focus of an initiative petition that was filed with the Secretary of State’s office on Tuesday, January 17.  If approved by voters, the initiative would amend the state constitution to eliminate teacher tenure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teacher tenure reform is the focus of an initiative petition that was filed with the Secretary of State’s office on Tuesday, January 17.  If approved by voters, the initiative would amend the state constitution to eliminate teacher tenure—in other words, any school district that receives public money could not make hiring and firing decisions based on seniority. After a ballot title is written, an estimated 150,000 signatures from 6 of Missouri’s 9 congressional districts will need to be collected before the issue is brought to voters.</p>
<p>CECM strongly supports efforts to end teacher tenure, including the ballot initiative. Excellent teachers are the key to the academic success of students, and ending teacher tenure would ensure that districts keep teachers based on how well they perform, not how long they’ve been on the job. This is one step to ensuring that an excellent teacher is in every classroom, as districts would be held more accountable for the performance of their instructional staff.</p>
<p>In addition to the initiative petition, legislation tackling teacher tenure is expected to be filed this week. Follow CECM on Twitter, <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/CECMissouri">@cecmissouri</a>, for the latest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/teacher-tenure-focus-ballot-initiative/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House and Senate Elementary and Secondary Education Committees hold hearings on the Foundation Funding Formula</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/house-senate-elementary-secondary</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/house-senate-elementary-secondary#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri School Funding Formula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative Mike Thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator David Pearce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, January 18, the House and Senate held hearings on almost identical bills that would change the laws regarding the elementary and secondary education funding formula. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, January 18, the House and Senate held hearings on almost identical bills that would change the laws regarding the elementary and secondary education funding formula. The bills are sponsored by Rep. Mike Thomson (R-Maryville) and Senator David Pearce (R-Warrensburg). At issue is a funding formula calculated in 2005 that was designed to provide adequate funds to all students by 2013. Budget shortfalls have delayed that goal, and these bills attempt to fix the $250 to $300 million shortfall that could pit districts against each other for funding. If the formula is not modified, “hold harmless” districts (See the list below for all districts classified as “Hold Harmless”) will receive a windfall of funds, while “formula” districts (all districts not listed below) will lose funds.</p>
<p>CECM does not have a position on these particular bills, however, we will continue to track this legislation and will watch for important amendments.</p>
<p>Projected FY 12 Hold Harmless Districts: Adair Co. R-1, Adair Co. R-2, Appleton City R-II, Ballard R-II, Bell City R-II, Belton 124, Belton Federal Lands, Boncl R-X, Bosworth R-V, Breckenridge R-I, Brentwood, Brookfield R-III, Brunswick R-II, Buchanan Co. R-IV, Bucklin R-II, Bunker R-III, Cainsville R-I, Calhoun R-VIII, Camdenton R-III, Center 58, Centerville R-I, Clayton, Climax Springs R-IV, Clinton Co. R-III, Community R-VI, Cooper Co. R-IV, Couch R-I, Cowgill R-VI, Craig, R-III, Dadeville R-II, Davis R-XII, Delta C-7, Drexel R-IV, East Buchanan Co. C-1, Everton R-III, Excelsior Springs 40, Fayette R-III, Fort Osage R-I, Gilliam C-4, Gilman City R-IV, Gorin R-III, Grandview C-4, Green City R-I, Grundy Co. R-V, Hancock Place, Hardeman R-X, Hardin-Central C-2, Hayti R-II, Hermitage R-IV, Hickman Mills C-1, Higbee R-VIII, Howell Valley R-I, Hume R-VIII, Hurley R-I, Jamestown C-1, Jasper Co. R-V, Jefferson C-123, Jennings, Junction Hill C-12, Kansas City 33, Keytesville R-III, King City R-I, Kingston 42, Kirkwood R-VII, Knob Noster Federal Lands, La Plata R-II, Ladue, Laredo R-VII, Lathrop R-II, Leesville R-IX, Leeton R-X, Lindbergh R-VIII, Livingston Co., R-III, Lonedell R-XIV, Luray 33, Macon Co. R-IV, Malta Bend R-V, Manes R-V, Maplewood-Richmond Heights, Marion Co. R-II, Marquand-Zion R-VI, Meadville R-IV, Miami R-I, Middle Grove C-1, Midway R-I, Miller Co. R-III, Mirabile C-1, Missouri City 56, Monroe City R-1, Montrose R-XIV, Mound City R-II, New Madrid Co., R-I, New York R-IV, Newtown-Harris R-III, Nodaway-Holt R-VII, Norborne R-VIII, Normandy, North Andrew Co. R-VI, North Daviess R-III, North Harrison R-III, North Mercer Co. R-III, North Nodaway Co. R-VI, North Pemiscot Co. R-I, North Shelby, Northeast Nodaway Co. R-V, Northwest R-I, Northwestern R-I, Oak Ridge R-VI, Orearville R-IV, Orrick R-XI, Osage Co. R-I, Osborn R-O, Otterville R-VI, Paris R-II, Parkway C-2, Pattonsburg R-II, Pattonville R-III, Pemiscot Co. R-III, Pettis Co. R-XII, Pleasant View R-VI, Prairie Home R-V, Renick R-V, Revere C-3, Richland R-I, Ridgeway R-V, Risco R-II, Riverview Gardens, School of the Osage R-II, Shawnee R-III, Shell Knob 78, Slater, South Callaway Co. R-II, South Holt Co. R-I, South Iron Co. R-I, South Nodaway Co R-IV, Southwest Livingston Co. R-I, Special School District of St. Louis County, St. Charles R-VI, St. Elizabeth R-IV, St. Louis City, Stanberry R-II, Stet R-XV, Stewartsville C-2, Sturgeon R-V, Swedeborg R-III, Tarkio R-I, Tina-Avalon R-II, Tri-County R-VII, Union Star R-II, University City, Voluntary Interdistrict Choice Corporation, Waynesville Federal Lands, Wellington-Napoleon R-IX, West Nodaway Co. R-I, West Platte Co. R-II, Westran R-I, Winston R-VI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/house-senate-elementary-secondary/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the 2012 Legislative Session!</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/session-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/session-2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lclancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Legislative Session]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Unaccredited School Districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Tilley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher Tenure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the opening day of the 2012 Legislative Session Speaker Steven Tilley outlined his vision for improving Missouri’s education system. Two of those issues are at the heart of what CECM believes to be the most crucial issues facing Missouri this year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the opening day of the 2012 Legislative Session Speaker Steven Tilley (R-Perryville) outlined his vision for improving Missouri’s education system. Two of those issues are at the heart of what CECM believes to be the most crucial issues facing Missouri this year. Read what Speaker Tilley discussed <a href="http://www.missourinet.com/2012/01/05/house-speaker-wants-to-bundle-education-issues-audio/">here</a>.</p>
<p>The two issues Speaker Tilley mentioned that CECM will focus on this legislative session are:</p>
<p>1. Student Transfers<br />
Missouri Revised Statute 167.131 allows for students who live in an unaccredited school district to transfer to a neighboring accredited district at the expense of the unaccredited district.  While this law was passed in 1993, signed by Mel Carnahan and ruled clear and unambiguous by the Missouri Supreme Court, school district officials are refusing to adhere to this law.</p>
<p>The Children’s Education Council of Missouri expects that there will be many attempts during the 2012 legislative session to “fix” this law. CECM believes that this law should not be altered unless it is for real reform such as statewide open enrollment and scholarship tax credits.</p>
<p>CECM cannot support any legislation that would lessen a family’s right to choose a better school for their child. For example, there is already a bill filed by Senator David Pearce (R-Warrensburg) and Representative Rick Stream (R-Kirkwood) that would strip students in these failed districts of their right to transfer.</p>
<p>CECM will continue to work hard this session to ensure that no child is stripped of his or her rights to leave a failed district.</p>
<p>2. Missouri Quality Teacher Act<br />
The Missouri Quality Teacher Act will reform teacher tenure so that good teachers are allowed to stay in classrooms where they can do the most good and bad teachers can be dismissed.</p>
<p>It is still unclear who will introduce this legislation, but rest assured it will move quickly and hopefully with the full backing of the majority of the House and Senate.</p>
<p>To stay updated on these issues and other issues that CECM is tracking, please subscribe to our weekly Missouri Education Reform Legislative Update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/session-2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor Nixon Signs Facebook Law Re-Vamp</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/missouri-legislation/governor-nixon-signs-facebook</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/missouri-legislation/governor-nixon-signs-facebook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcasas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MO Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kate Casas, State Director, Children&#8217;s Education Council of Missouri Governor Jay Nixon signed legislation on Friday that would repeal a controversial measure that limited online communication between students and teachers.  The measure, which came to be known as the Facebook Law, came under fire late last summer when education advocates realized it would ban most online communication between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate Casas, State Director, Children&#8217;s Education Council of Missouri</p>
<p>Governor Jay Nixon signed legislation on Friday that would repeal a controversial measure that limited online communication between students and teachers. </p>
<p>The measure, which came to be known as the Facebook Law, came under fire late last summer when education advocates realized it would ban most online communication between students and teachers. The law became so controversial that the legislature passed a repeal of the law during Special Session in September which Governor Nixon signed today.</p>
<p>You can read more about the repeal and the origional law<a href="http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/mo-repeals-teacher-student-internet-restrictions"> here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/missouri-legislation/governor-nixon-signs-facebook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Child Left Behind Reauthorization Underway in U.S. Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/child-left-reauthorization-underway</link>
		<comments>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/child-left-reauthorization-underway#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kcasas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elementary and Secondary Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cec-mo.org/?p=3107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kate Casas, State Director, Children&#8217;s Education Council of Missouri The United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) has had a busy two days. Its members have been engrossed in a lively debate over Senator Tom Harkin, D-IA and Michael Enzi, R-WY’s bill to reauthorize No Child Left Behind, or as NCLB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate Casas, State Director, Children&#8217;s Education Council of Missouri</p>
<p>The United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) has had a busy two days. Its members have been engrossed in a lively debate over Senator Tom Harkin, D-IA and Michael Enzi, R-WY’s bill to reauthorize No Child Left Behind, or as NCLB is more formally called, The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).</p>
<p>Nearly everyone in the education field will agree that NCLB isn’t perfect. However, reformers around the country are concerned that the level of accountability and transparency that parents have come to expect from schools is being jeopardized in this bill to make the goals of the legislation more attainable than what currently exists under NCLB (100% proficiency in math and science by 2014).</p>
<p>This debate is far from over. It is still unclear what the final bill that the HELP Committee will send to the Senate floor will contain. It is even more unclear what the House of Representatives will do.  However, it is important that education reformers around the country are paying attention and that when the bill gets to a vote of the full senate, you let Missouri&#8217;s Senators hear your voice.</p>
<p>You can keep up with the Committee’s mark-up<a href="http://www.educationsector.org/who-we-are"> here </a>and Education Sector had provided an excellent “quick look” at the good and bad in the Harkin-Enzi bill<a href="http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ESEA-Good-Bad-Chart_Updated10_17.pdf"> here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cec-mo.org/featured/child-left-reauthorization-underway/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

